SDN Focus is brought to you in partnership with:

Mitch Pronschinske is the Lead Research Analyst at DZone. Researching and compiling content for DZone's research guides is his primary job. He likes to make his own ringtones, watches cartoons/anime, enjoys card and board games, and plays the accordion. Mitch is a DZone Zone Leader and has posted 2577 posts at DZone. You can read more from them at their website. View Full User Profile

Special Hardware and Virtualization: Two Paths to SDN

  • submit to reddit

Another article by Patrick Moorhead piqued my interest today.  It asks a question about whether network complexity is better solved by virtualization, or a change in hardware.  Obviously, a lot of vendors will push their hardware as the best way to achieve software-defined networking, as opposed to the more free and open virtualization strategies involving standards like OpenFlow.  But I think this in-depth paper, and Moorhead's opinions both point toward network virtualization, unless you already have a variety of specialized hardware.

Network Virtualization Versus Next Generation Servers: Who Wins?

The article also has a neat diagram of commodity rack servers, blades, and hyperscale servers.